Friday, May 30, 2008
OK, so I can fully appreciate wanting to observe, study and learn all we can about the small, uncontacted tribes that live in extremely isolated areas of the world. They can give us an insight into human evolution, culture and history. They provide a window to our past, and possibly some opportunities to influence the future.
But this is ridiculous!
These tribesmen are probably scared shitless by the "flying god" that was hovering over their little village (note that in several of the pictures, tribesmen are aiming arrows at the helicopter, and what looks to be a shaman or tribal leader painted in black urging them on). Without doubt, the sight and sound of such an amazingly alien craft would not only frighten and amaze them, but completely change their world. One single act of stupidity, and they've gone from being completely isolated and "uncontacted", to being at least a little cognizant of something outside their limited area of life and view of their world.
Why didn't the Brazilian government, who did this exploration, use some other far less invasive and intrusive means to look for tribes like this one? Use an unmanned drone aircraft! Borrow some satellite time! Anything other than a low-altitude helicopter!
A Predator drone (like the ones used by the US Army in Iraq and Afghanistan) is able to fly at altitudes that put it out of sight from the ground. It's engines are so small that no sound is detectable, and yet it can still take extremely high resolution still and video pictures of anything the operator wishes. They're also cheap to operate, can fly for 10's of hours at a time without landing or refueling, and can travel hundreds of miles per flight (none of which a helicopter can do).
Instead of treating these innocent, untrammeled tribes with respect, decency and honor, they've made a showcase of them for the amusement of the "civilized" world. And by using such a stupid, asinine method of observation, the Brazilian government has probably changed the course of this one tribe's future forever.
There’s nothing wrong with being ignorant. I’m ignorant. There are lots of things I don’t know. There are lots of things that I could learn about, but I don’t want to. There’s nothing wrong with that, as long as it is an admitted fault. The problem is, many people refuse to admit their ignorance, and then proudly display it by discussing those very subjects in which they are ignorant.
I have thought about it, and concluded that there are several types of ignorance. Some are natural, some are accidental, and some are intentional. All of them revolve around the notion that a person does not know something. Here’s what I view to be the types of ignorance.
General ignorance: A natural state that all humans start off in. Babies are “ignorant” of just about everything. This can be easily corrected by trial and error, self-teaching and instruction.
Circumstantial Ignorance: A state of ignorance that results from a person’s circumstances of life. As a native-born American, I have circumstantial ignorance of the rules of the game “Cricket”. Although this can be corrected, the time and effort needed to do so doesn’t match the resultant gain of knowledge (I can learn all I want about Cricket, but since the likelihood of my ever playing in, or seeing firsthand a Cricket match is minimal, the effort would not be useful). This usually starts off as a subset of General Ignorance, but becomes Willful Admitted Ignorance once it is identified.
Willful Ignorance: There are two types of Willful Ignorance, Admitted and Ignored.
Admitted: This is when a person recognized and acknowledges ignorance of a subject. As stated above, I have Willful Admitted Ignorance about Cricket. Usually, a person who Admits Ignorance of a subject will shy away from detailed discussion of such subjects. This does not preclude a person from participating in such discussions, but they will generally keep their participation to a minimum so as to learn more about the subject (which in turn will limit or eliminate the Ignorance of said subject).
Ignored: The most dangerous form of Ignorance. Also, it is the most difficult to eliminate. This occurs when a person acknowledges an area of Ignorance (either General or Circumstantial), and makes a conscious decision to Ignore it. Often, this occurs because to eliminate the Ignorance (i.e., learn about the subject) would challenge deeply held convictions or beliefs. Instead of allowing personal beliefs and convictions to be challenged (and potentially overturned), the person refuses to admit that such knowledge exists. This results in a stifling of learning, stagnation of intellectual growth, and often leads to conflicts with others who have knowledge about the areas in which a person has Willful Ignored Ignorance.
There is nothing inherently wrong with ignorance. It’s a fact of life that everyone is ignorant. I would hazard to guess that there is more to be ignorant about in this world than is possible to know. However, to admit such ignorance and either choose to correct it (where possible) or acknowledge the gap in knowledge is an admirable thing. This allows a person to grow and learn in areas in which they are interested in, and add any and all knowledge that comes to them, no matter what the subject, which helps in eliminating Ignorance.
The most damaging and destructive thing a person can do to themselves and others is to have Willful Ignored Ignorance. If a person’s beliefs or convictions cannot stand up to and survive the onslaught of potentially contradictory information, it is most likely that the beliefs and convictions need adjusted or replaced, not the knowledge that challenges them. Although this can be a painful and difficult process, the personal growth in knowledge and capabilities will see a person through.
Another damaging result of Willful Ignored Ignorance is that people who possess it attempt to pass it along. Often, because they Willfully Ignore the information that would correct misperceptions, errors or lies – ones either they were told, or ones they pass along – those errors and lies get passed on to others. These others often don’t realize there is knowledge that would fill in the gaps or correct the errors, and are caught in a dilemma. Although they’ve received Willfully Ignored Ignorance, they themselves suffer from Circumstantial Ignorance, because they did not recognize that they were Ignorant of outside information. Unfortunately, these people are often told not to listen to anyone who disagrees or contradicts the Willfully Ignored Ignorance. When these unfortunates are finally confronted with knowledge that contradicts what they’ve been instructed, they are forced into an unpleasant and extremely difficult decision. Do they continue to abide by the information they’ve already received, and thereby force themselves into Willfully Ignored Ignorance, or do they work to learn the new information, and intentionally discard information from what was a trusted source?
You might be wondering about the name of my blog -- Amhras Scuaine. I happen to be of Irish/Gaelic descent, and thought it would be interesting to come up with an Irish/Gaelic term that fits what my blog will be about and who I view myself as. I am not a Gaelic scholar, so I don't know for certain that this is the correct terminology or phrasing, but from what I've researched, the term roughly translates as "stream of doubt" or "stream of skepticism".
Now, you may wonder what "stream of doubt" means. I intend it to have many, from the reflection of a blog (stream of consciousness) to the skepticism of unbelief (doubting thoughts) , even to the love of nature and the world (streams, rivers and such). Yes, I intend to cover a bunch of topics, themes and ideas as I write - from science, personal interactions, news of the day, creationism, evolution, family, etc.
Anyway, keep reading -- I'll be posting new entries somewhat frequently (hopefully).